State Agreement Electoral College

Click here for a detailed explanation for each sentence in the National Popular Vote Compact Bill. “Since the 1960s, I`ve been interested in the peculiarities of the Electoral College,” Koza said. Some of us have come together and said that a state approach we have might be a better way to get a national referendum. That is how the national referendum began. The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is an agreement that would give the votes of its member states to the candidate who wins the referendum. Once 270 votes have been cast, a victory for the votes would ensure presidential victory for the candidate in the referendum. Note: The number of votes cast is for the 2012, 2016 and 2020 elections. DC is counted as status for the purposes of this chart. Opponents of a national referendum argue that the Electoral College is a fundamental part of the federal system created by the Constitutional Convention. In particular, with the Connecticut compromise, bicameral legislation – with proportional state representation in the House of Representatives and equal state representation in the Senate – has become a compromise between less populous states that fear dominating their interests and voices over-burned by larger states[40] and larger states that saw everything but proportional voting as an affront to the principles of democratic representation. introduced. [41] The ratio of the population of the most populous and least populated states is currently much greater (66.10 at the time of the 2010 census) than when the Connecticut compromise was adopted (7.35 at the time of the 1790 census), which exaggerates the non-proportional aspect of the allocation of the compromise.

Based on population estimates, some states that have adopted the pact are expected to lose one or two votes due to the distribution of Congress after the 2020 census, which could increase the number of additional states needed to pass the measure. [156] You can read more about the myths of big cities. As discussed in the previous section, a narrow analogy for a national campaign is the survey of presidential campaigns in battle countries, where they actually campaign in cities, suburbs and rural areas.